MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998953345

Pengaruh perbedaan tegangan listrik pemanas terhadap performa mesin pendingin menggunakan refrigeran r-12, r134a, dan mc-134 di laboratorium prestasi Fakultas Teknologi Industri Universitas Trisakti

2019· article· id· W2998953345 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Arif Akhmad Aliandi

Bibliographic record

VenueSKRIPSI-2019 · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seiring dengan perkembangan teknologi dan pertambahan penduduk, kebutuhan akan air conditioner (AC) semakin meningkat, baik yang digunakan dalam industr i, perkantoran, gedung, perumahan, kendaraan, dan lainnya. Dalam penggunaan AC diperlukan refrigeran. Berdassrkan perjanjian montreal, disepakati penggant ia n refrigeran yang lebih ramah lingkungan. Refrigeran yang digunakan saat ini adalah refrigeran dengan senyawa CFC dan HCFC. Penggunaan refrigeran ini mengakibatka n ODP dan GWP. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui efisiensi energi refrigeran R-12, R-134a, dan MC-134 dengan membandingkan nilai COP menggunakan mesin Refrigeration Laboratory Unit. Berdasarkan hasil pengujian, COP refrigeran MC-134 memiliki nilai paling tinggi dibanding refrigeran r12 dan R-134a, maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa refrigeran hidrokarbon MC-134 layak dipertimbangkan sebagai pengganti refrigeran R-12 dan R-134a, dengan tetap memperhatikan sifat mudah terbakar dari hidrokarbon pada temperatur tertentu.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSKRIPSI-2019Same topicEngineering and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207