MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2998980345 · doi:10.33426/rcg/2019/107/1461

Justicia preventiva ante riesgos constitucionales

2019· article· es· W2998980345 on OpenAlexaff
Paloma Martínez Santa María

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de las Cortes Generales · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicEthics and bioethics in healthcare
Canadian institutionsMicrosemi (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTribunalHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El comentario trata sobre una resolución del Tribunal Constitucional de evidente interés general, no solo por la trascendencia política de los hechos que se juzgan, sino también desde el punto de vista del análisis jurídico, por dos cuestiones principalmente, por ser la primera vez que se somete al Tribunal Constitucional la impugnación de una investidura de un Presidente del órgano de un gobierno autonómico, y por la peculiarísima forma en la que el Tribunal decide adoptar medidas cautelares incluso antes de pronunciarse sobre la admisibilidad de la impugnación.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.014
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de las Cortes GeneralesSame topicEthics and bioethics in healthcareFrench-language works237,207