Structural Design and Construction Challenges on the South and West of Edmonton Area Development Project
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 2013, AltaLink initiated work on the South and West of Edmonton Area development project comprised of multiple 138-kV and 240-kV circuit modifications. Scopes included greenfield construction, rebuilding existing lines, and tapping existing lines to new substations. The complicated project scopes were challenging to construct due to outage constraints, environmental restrictions, and the need for multiple foundation solutions. Proper outage planning with the AltaLink Control Center was imperative and directly impacted the construction sequencing of the project. Environmental concerns affected the project in multiple ways: work restrictions during bird nesting and migration seasons, requirements for rig matting in environmentally sensitive and wet areas, and the use of vehicle wash stations. A variety of structure types were implemented on the project including double-circuit latticed steel towers, single-, double-, and triple-circuit tubular steel poles, and wood poles. Foundation types, including drilled shafts, helical foundations, and direct embed foundations, were selected based on structure type and location. Construction commenced in early 2017, and the project was placed in service in December 2017.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".