MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2999011971 · doi:10.1161/circ.140.suppl_2.227

Abstract 227: Sudden Cardiac Arrest During Exercise Occurs Infrequently and With Few Warning Symptoms

2019· article· en· W2999011971 on OpenAlexaffabout
Katherine S. Allan, Brian Grunau, Morgan Haines, Armin Nowroozpoor, James Christenson, Floyd Besserer, Christopher B. Fordyce, Paul Dorian, Steve Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of British Columbia HospitalSt. Paul's HospitalSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIncidence (geometry)Sudden cardiac arrestPopulationInternal medicineCohortSudden cardiac deathCardiopulmonary resuscitationMetabolic equivalentEmergency medicineCardiologyPhysical therapyPhysical activityResuscitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The incidence and details of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) during exercise in the general population are not well described. We describe a cohort ages 2-85 who experienced an SCA within ≤ 1 hour of moderate to vigorous activity in 4 metropolitan areas of British Columbia, Canada. Methods: We reviewed prehospital records of consecutive out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) in the provincial BC OHCA Registry from June 17 2017 to August 16 2018. We included non-traumatic OHCAs treated by EMS occurring within ≤ 1 hour of exercise. We defined SCA as an OHCA of no obvious cause, witnessed/unwitnessed, survived/died. We assigned an estimated metabolic equivalent (MET) score to each type of physical activity. We defined moderate exercise as a MET score of 3-5.9 and vigorous as ≥6. Results: A total of 2674 OHCAs occurred during the study period of which 56 SCAs (2.1%) occurred within ≤1 hour of participation in 23 types of exercise (Figure 1). The incidence of SCA during exercise was 1.45 (95% CI 1.10-1.88) per 100,000 population. The median age was 56.5 [IQR 45-69] and 87.5% (49/56) were male. Most exercise related SCAs occurred in public (49/56 87.5%), 83.3% (45/54) were bystander witnessed and 85% (46/54) received bystander CPR. Over 70% (40/56) had a shockable rhythm. The survival rate was 55.4% (31/56). Half of the SCAs collapsed during exercise (49.1%; 26/53) while the other half collapsed within ≤1 hour after exercising (51%; 27/53). Symptom data were available in 46% of patients (23/50) with most experiencing chest pain, dizziness, feeling unwell or seizure just prior to collapse. Conclusions: SCAs during exercise are rare and frequently occur in a public location. Survival is high and may be related to witnessed and public location status. Equal numbers of SCAs collapsed during or ≤ 1 hour of exercising and symptoms were present in almost half. Future research is needed to determine what factors could predict those at highest risk for SCA in order to prevent future events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→