MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2999015016 · doi:10.4000/fcs.4065

L’innovation territoriale : manager en mode pilotage ou en logistique?

2020· article· fr· W2999015016 on OpenAlexaff
Gérard Divay

Bibliographic record

VenueFinance Contrôle Stratégie · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsÉcole Nationale d'Administration Publique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePilotagePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet essai questionne l’intégration des pratiques innovantes et ses effets sur les rôles, fonctions et responsabilités des acteurs territoriaux. Plus spécifiquement, il s’agit d’envisager un dépassement du paradigme du pilotage de l’action publique, pour mieux comprendre les défis de gestion de l’innovation territoriale, en inscrivant les fonctions du management local dans un paradigme de logistique du collectif. Ce faisant, la reconfiguration des rôles et responsabilités qu’exige le paradigme logistique suppose des capacités de gestion de la mobilisation des acteurs territoriaux et des tensions de rôle qui accompagnent les changements opérés suite à des innovations territoriales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFinance Contrôle StratégieSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207