MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2999067553 · doi:10.1061/9780784482506.054

Mechanical Performance of a Pressure Pipe CIPP Liner with Stress Concentration Effects Associated with Local Defects

2019· article· en· W2999067553 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePipelines 2019 · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStress (linguistics)Materials scienceComposite materialStructural engineeringForensic engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, continuum finite element modelling procedures are used to examine the mechanical response and performance of a cured in place pipe (CIPP) liner for pressure pipe. The external cast iron pipe and internal CIPP liner was modelled using three-dimensional brick (C3D8I) elements with multiple elements through thickness depending on the CIPP liner diameter to wall thickness (D/t) ratio. The modelling procedures were calibrated with available public domain data and the anisotropic material behaviour of the CIPP liner was established using tensile coupon tests data. A parameter study was conducted to assess mechanical performance of a pressure pipe CIPP liner with stress concentration effects due to local defects (e. g. wall voids). The sensitivity study investigated the CIPP liner outside diameter to CIPP wall thickness ratio (D/t), host pipe void diameter to host pipe inside diameter ratio (d/D), hoop stress due to internal pressure to yield stress ratio for the CIPP liner (σh/σy), and CIPP liner/host pipe interface friction coefficient (μ). Performance envelopes were developed that were consistent with current engineering practice and illustrated a class of parameters where an engineering condition assessment would be required to evaluate the CIPP liner performance. Material yield behaviour was observed for the higher liner dimension (D/t > 60) and hoop stress to yield ratios (σh/σy ≥ 0.6). The limit state can be governed by axial tension rather than ring tension when void ratios (d/D) are greater than 0.4. As the void ratio (d/D) increases, the hoop stress tends to behave as an unconstrained liner in the radial direction. The fully bonded interface has a distinct effect of reducing the axial, hoop, and effective stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it