MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2999091049 · doi:10.1049/iet-gtd.2019.0415

Network partitioning approach for reactive power/voltage control using analytical nodes coupling expressions

2020· article· en· W2999091049 on OpenAlexaff
Weixing Li, Aina Tian, Jin Ma, Xiaoming Mou, Xiaodong Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Generation Transmission & Distribution · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersState Grid Corporation of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceGenerator (circuit theory)GridMerge (version control)Coupling (piping)Electric power systemPower (physics)AlgorithmParallel computingMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power‐grid partitioning is an important prerequisite for power systems security analysis and control. In this study, a novel recursive grid bipartitioning strategy is proposed. First, two analytical expressions are derived from Kirchhoff's equations to represent coupling relationships between nodes. Then, generator nodes under study are divided into two groups by recursively applying the coupling relationships between generator nodes. Finally, the coupling relationships between generator and load nodes are used to merge relevant load nodes to the corresponding groups of generators. The stopping criterion of the grid bipartitioning process is also discussed. The proposed bipartitioning strategy is implemented on the IEEE 118‐bus system and a practical provincial power grid in China to demonstrate its effectiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Generation Transmission & DistributionSame topicPower System Optimization and StabilityFrench-language works237,207