MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Restoration of the natural E(1/2<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si1.svg"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo linebreak="badbreak" linebreakstyle="after">+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math>) - E(3/2<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" altimg="si1.svg"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo linebreak="badbreak" linebreakstyle="after">+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math>) energy splitting in odd-K isotopes towards N = 40

2020· article· lv· W2999098407 on OpenAlexaff
Y. Sun, A. Obertelli, P. Doornenbal, C. Barbieri, Yoshiki Chazono, T. Duguet, Hongna Liu, P. Navrátil, F. Nowacki, Kazuyuki Ogata, Takaharu Otsuka, Francesco Raimondi, V. Somà, Y. Utsuno, K. Yoshida, N. L. Achouri, H. Baba, F. Browne, D. Calvet, F. Château, S. Chen, N. Chiga, A. Corsi, M. L. Cortés, A. Delbart, J.-M. Gheller, A. Giganon, A. Gillibert, T. Isobe, T. Kobayashi, Y. Kubota, V. Lapoux, T. Motobayashi, I. Murray, H. Otsu, V. Panin, N. Paul, W. Rodríguez, H. Sakuraï, M. Sasano, D. Steppenbeck, L. Stuhl, Y. Togano, Т. Уесака, K. Wimmer, K. Yoneda, Ö. Aktaş, T. Aumann, L. X. Chung, F. Flavigny, S. Franchoo, I. Gašparić, R.-B. Gerst, J. Gibelin, K. I. Hahn, D. Kim, T. Koiwai, Y. Kondo, P. Koseoglou, J. Lee, C. Lehr, B. D. Linh, T. Lokotko, M. MacCormick, K. Moschner, T. Nakamura, S. Y. Park, D. Rossi, E. Şahin, D. Sohler, P.-A. Söderström, Satoshi Takeuchi, H. Törnqvist, V. Vaquero, V. Wagner, S. Wang, V. Werner, X. Xu, Hiroki Yamada, D. Yan, Z. Yang, Masahiro Yasuda, L. Zanetti

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Letters B · 2020
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersEuropean Research CouncilScience and Technology Facilities CouncilRIKENHelmholtz International Center for FAIRNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs HivatalMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies AlternativesBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungHrvatska Zaklada za ZnanostNational Research Foundation of KoreaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftHelmholtz Graduate School for Hadron and Ion ResearchEuropean CommissionJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeMinistry of Science and TechnologyGrand Équipement National De Calcul IntensifAlexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
KeywordsPhysicsExcited stateProtonAtomic physicsNucleonSpectroscopyAngular momentumAb initioGround stateVertex (graph theory)Nuclear physicsQuantum mechanicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on the first γ-ray spectroscopy of 51,53K produced via the 52,54Ca(p,2p) reactions at ∼250 MeV/nucleon. Unambiguous final-state angular-momentum assignments were achieved for beam intensities down to few particles per second by using a new technique based on reaction vertex tracking combined with a thick liquid-hydrogen target. Through γ-ray spectroscopy and exclusive parallel momentum distribution analysis, 3/2+ ground states and 1/2+ first excited states in 51,53K were established quantifying the natural ordering of the 1d3/2 and 2s1/2 proton-hole states that are restored at N = 32 and 34. State-of-the-art ab initio calculations and shell-model calculations with improved phenomenological effective interactions reproduce the present data and predict consistently the increase of the E(1/21+) - E(3/21+) energy differences towards N = 40.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.007
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0080.009
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1940.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics Letters BSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207