Emplacement of unusual rhyolitic to basaltic ignimbrites during collapse of a basalt-dominated caldera: The Halarauður eruption, Krafla (Iceland)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Deposits of the ca. 110 ka Halarauður eruption of Krafla caldera (reconstructed volume = 7 ± 6 km3 dense rock equivalent) include the only spatter-rich ignimbrite known in Iceland, and an exceptionally rare lava-like basaltic ignimbrite. We present a revised stratigraphy and new whole-rock major-element data set for products of this unusual event, one of only three Quaternary ignimbrite eruptions identified in Iceland. Compositions of Halarauður products span a broad range (50.0–74.6 wt% SiO2), reflecting mixing of rhyolite with underplating basalt. Small-volume, valley-ponded, basal pumice- and spatter-bearing lithic breccias and ignimbrite (rhyolite to andesite) reflect rapid column collapse during early opening of ring-fault vents. A transition to voluminous, regionally dispersed spatter agglomerates (dacite to basaltic andesite) marks an abrupt eruptive intensification, as gas-poor magma was squeezed into a developing ring-fault system by the subsiding chamber roof. Spatial heterogeneities in ascent rates and outgassing through this variably dilated fault system caused coeval formation of collapsing plumes and spatter fountains at separate vents. Spatter was entrained into flows from the more explosive vents, which deposited proximal spatter agglomerates and more distal spatter-bearing ignimbrite. Overlying lava-like ignimbrite deposits (basaltic andesite to basalt) reflect a final opening of vents, as mafic magma from deep levels of the chamber was squeezed through a dilated ring-fault system by the subsiding roof block and erupted at uncharacteristically high mass flux. Development of a mature ring-fault conduit system during early tapping of silicic magma appears to be a prerequisite for the emplacement of welded basaltic ignimbrites, and it should be considered as a possible eruption scenario in basalt-dominated systems where silicic magma has been known to also accumulate. Poor preservation of the Halarauður deposits exemplifies the challenges of studying ignimbrite eruptions in frequently glaciated regions like Iceland, where they may be more common than the geological record suggests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".