MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2999115965 · doi:10.1002/gj.3741

Provenance and tectonic setting of the Palaeozoic sediments in the northern Alxa area: Implications for the Central Asian Orogenic Belt

2020· article· en· W2999115965 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsCentre de Géomatique du Québec
FundersChina Earthquake Administration
KeywordsGeologyProvenanceCratonPaleozoicPassive marginContinental marginSedimentary rockGeochemistryBasementProterozoicTectonicsPaleontologyPetrologyRift

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Understanding the tectonic nature of the Alxa area is significant in tectonic reconstruction of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, but their tectonic correlation, affinity, and implications have not been well defined. The late Palaeozoic sediments in the northern Alxa area can help to understand this question. The sedimentary sequence of the late Palaeozoic strata (Benbatu Formation) indicates that the sedimentary environment of the study area gradually changed from a stable carbonate platform to a bathyal‐abyssal environment with relatively active tectonic setting. The results of the grain size analysis of the sandstone debris show the typical characteristics of a turbidity current. The composition of clastic particles is mainly feldspar, which is characterized by short transport distance and rapid deposition of sediments. Combined with the geochemical characteristics of sandstone, the northern Alxa Block is considered to be an active continental margin in the late Palaeozoic. Through summarizing the zircon data of the Alxa Block, Tarim Craton, and North China Craton, it is concluded that the Palaeozoic clastic zircons in the study area come from the Alxa Block and the surrounding magmatic arc, the Neoproterozoic‐Middle Proterozoic zircons come from the Alxa Block, the Archean zircons come from the North China Craton. According to the age distribution of clastic zircons, the magmatic activity may exist in the early Palaeozoic, which suggests it may not be a stable passive continental margin in the margin of northern Alxa Block in the early Palaeozoic. Based on the provenance analyses, the sources block shows no tectonic affinity to the Tarim Craton, but the Hanwula area in the north of the study area might have been accreted to the Tarim Craton, which means the size of the Paleo‐Asian Ocean between the study area and the Hangwula area is large. The earliest Palaeozoic clastic zircon ages in sedimentary rocks are recorded in the late Cambrian, whereas the earliest Palaeozoic detrital zircons in the Hangwula area are recorded in the Ordovician, which means that the magmatic activity recorded in the study area is earlier than the Hangwula area and indicates that the subduction of the south side of the Paleo‐Asian Ocean began earlier than the north side. The evidence of magmatic rocks discovered so far confirms this view.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it