MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2999129065 · doi:10.21474/ijar01/10197

POLICY AND IMPLEMENTATION GAP : A MULTI - COUNTRY PERSPECTIVE

2019· article· en· W2999129065 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Gina Teddy, Martina Lembani, Boroto Hwabamungu, Dintle Molosiwa

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advanced Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Policy Implementation Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsCapePublic healthPerspective (graphical)GeographyObservatoryEconomic growthPublic health policyPublic policyPolitical sciencePublic administrationHealth policyArchaeologyMedicineNursingEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Widespread evidence on implementation indicates that health policies once adopted are not implemented as envisioned and do not always achieve the intended outcomes. The challenges associated

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.035
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.052
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0350.052
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0050.010
Scholarly communication0.0170.019
Open science0.0030.012
Research integrity0.0080.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.553
GPT teacher head0.778
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Advanced ResearchSame topicHealth Policy Implementation ScienceFrench-language works237,207