MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2999171346

Longevity, Frailty and Ageism.

2019· article· en· W2999171346 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M E Yeolekar

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Care Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLongevityLife expectancyMedicineGerontologyLife spanHealth careMedical careDemographyEnvironmental healthEconomic growthPopulationFamily medicineSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human lifespan has seen a rise globally. Extended lifespan is a trend projected to persist and continue. The gap is wide: from 52.67 years in the Central African Republic to 80.3 years in the OECD (Canada, Germany, Mexico, France, Japan, UK). In India the expectancy was 68.8 years in 2018. Concordant with the enhanced life span have been studies that explain determinants and mechanisms of human longevity, much of which has been attributed to better public health measures and improved care. The natural twin consequences of longevity: a) Frailty its characteristics and management and b) the behavioural cum attitudinal phenomenon of Ageism have come to the fore and require appropriate corrections. Physicians need to be aware of the demographic changes and implications thereof in management and healthcare. The medical aspects of either are elaborated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.181
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicGlobal Health Care IssuesFrench-language works237,207