La sostenibilidad como referencia para la gestión de los destinos turísticos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo determinar las herramientas, métodos y/o modelos que permitan evaluar la sostenibilidad en un destino turístico, tomando como base las que refiere la literatura científica consultada y a partir de parámetros definidos en investigaciones precedentes sobre el estudio de la sostenibilidad. Utilizando fundamentalmente los métodos de síntesis de la bibliografía sobre el tema objeto de estudio y el análisis comparativo. Los resultados de este análisis demostraron que las herramientas modelos y métodos no permiten evaluar la sostenibilidad desde un enfoque interdimensional, intradimensional y multidimensional que integre las dinámicas complejas que concurren en la gestión de un destino turístico, sentando las bases para realizar investigaciones desde otras áreas del conocimiento en la búsqueda de instrumentos dirigidos a reconocer y a comprender la visión holística de la sostenibilidad en los destinos turísticos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".