Bibliographic record
Abstract
The key event of early 2011 was the Arab Spring Like all revolutions, despair sparked hope which sparked actions which eventually went beyond the control of anyone. It is many decades too early to determine their impact. Of less global importance, but a source of immense satisfaction was the US Navy Seal Team Six’s operation in Pakistan that killed Osama bin Laden. Far less inspiring was the meltdown at Japan’s nuclear plant at Fukushima. General elections in Canada and Portugal as well as regional and local balloting in Spain and the UK showed that the economic crisis had become a key factor in politics. In the US, the Tea Party began to show that was as uncontrollable as the streets of Cairo, although mercifully less violent. Republican Speaker John Boehner, allegedly the most powerful member of Congress, was reduced to relying on Democratic votes to pass significant legislation. Meanwhile, the GOP candidates who wished to challenge Barack Obama for the presidency in 2012 began announcing their attentions. And at the floor of the Gulf of Mexico, BP experienced a drilling disaster that had thousands of gallons of crude oil gushing into the ocean.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".