MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2999327288

Documentário interativo jornalístico "Seven Digital Deadly Sins" e a experiência do utilizador

2019· dissertation· pt· W2999327288 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Estudos Anglo-Portugueses/Journal of Anglo-Portuguese Studies · 2019
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRadio, Podcasts, and Digital Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Em um cenário em que o jornalismo busca alternativas para manter-se relevante com o público, a interatividade surge como uma das grandes vedetes da era digital. Com um aumento no poder de engajamento e das transformações nas dinâmicas de produção e recepção do conteúdo online, o documentário interativo desponta como uma das alternativas encontradas para acompanhar a nova dinâmica de poder entre os media e a audiência. Com o utilizador no centro do processo, faz-se necessário entender como a interatividade pode moldar e influenciar o comportamento deste ao acessar sites jornalísticos, uma vez que os estudos voltados para a verdadeira experiência do utilizador nesses ambientes ainda são poucos e incipientes. O presente estudo visa investigar os documentários interativos jornalísticos como um gênero emergente, privilegiando um olhar sobre o documentário "The Seven Digital Deadly Sins", uma coprodução do The Guardian e National Film Board of Canada, e como a experiência do utilizador com a interatividade presente neste projeto influencia o comportamento deste durante a navegação.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0130.019
Scholarly communication0.0170.009
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Estudos Anglo-Portugueses/Journal of Anglo-Portuguese StudiesSame topicRadio, Podcasts, and Digital MediaFrench-language works237,207