MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Peer Conflict Resolution

2020· other· en· W2999327515 on OpenAlexaff
Christina M. Rinaldi, Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent Development · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConflict resolutionPsychologySocial psychologyCompetence (human resources)Social competenceSocial exchange theorySocial conflictConflict resolution strategyPeer reviewPolitical scienceSocial changeSociologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peer conflict and its resolution are central features of children's and adolescents' peer relationships. The strategies chosen and implemented during disagreements with peers have both positive and negative consequences for individuals' social and emotional functioning as well as their future relationships. This entry reviews key theoretical approaches to explaining peer conflict (exchange theory, social interdependence, dual concern theory, and social competence). It also discusses future directions in research, theory, and methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Encyclopedia of Child and Adolescent DevelopmentSame topicChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207