Nonsmooth Optimization Algorithms for Multicast Beamforming in Content-Centric Fog Radio Access Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper considers a content-centric fog radio access network (F-RAN). Its multi-antenna remote radio heads (RRHs) are capable of caching and executing signal processing for content delivery to its users. The fronthaul traffic is thus saved since its baseband processing unit (BBU) needs to transfer only the cache-missed content items to the RRHs via limited-capacity fronthaul links. The problem of beamforming design maximizing the energy efficiency in content delivery subject to the quality-of-content-service constraints in terms of content throughput and fronthaul limited-capacity is addressed. Unlike the user's throughput in user-centric networks, the content throughput in content-centric networks is no longer a differentiable function of the beamforming vectors. The problem is inherently high-dimensional due to the involvement of many beamforming vectors even in simple cases of three RRHs serving three users. Path-following algorithms, which invoke a simple convex quadratic optimization problem to generate a better feasible point, are proposed for computation of this nonsmooth and high-dimensional optimization problem. We also employ generalized zero-forcing beamforming, which forces the multi-content interference to zero or nearly to zero to reduce the problem dimensionality for computational efficiency. Numerical results are provided to demonstrate their computational effectiveness. They also reveal that when the fronthaul traffic becomes more flexible, hard-transfer fronthauling is more energy efficient than soft-transfer fronthauling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".