Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Québec a fait le choix original, il y a dix ans, d’implanter un nouvel enseignement d’éthique et culture religieuse obligatoire pour tous les élèves des écoles primaires et secondaires. Ce programme propose une approche culturelle de l’étude du phénomène religieux en vue de favoriser sa compréhension dans la diversité des formes qu’il peut emprunter. Or, faire des religions un objet d’apprentissage scolaire parmi d’autres ne va pas sans susciter nombre de critiques et de résistances qui témoignent d’un rapport difficile au religieux dans la société québécoise. Le regard porté sur les religions, parfois négatif et simplificateur, tend à en faire des objets nuisibles, du moins désuets, devant être jugés à l’aune de valeurs contemporaines, et ce, au détriment de l’analyse informée de réalités historiques complexes, ainsi que d’une réflexion favorisant la compréhension du monde contemporain et de l’humanité dans l’ensemble de sa riche diversité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".