MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2999432105 · doi:10.7202/1066575ar

La culture religieuse comme objet d’apprentissage

2019· article· fr· W2999432105 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThéologiques · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion and Society Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesEthnologyPhilosophySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le Québec a fait le choix original, il y a dix ans, d’implanter un nouvel enseignement d’éthique et culture religieuse obligatoire pour tous les élèves des écoles primaires et secondaires. Ce programme propose une approche culturelle de l’étude du phénomène religieux en vue de favoriser sa compréhension dans la diversité des formes qu’il peut emprunter. Or, faire des religions un objet d’apprentissage scolaire parmi d’autres ne va pas sans susciter nombre de critiques et de résistances qui témoignent d’un rapport difficile au religieux dans la société québécoise. Le regard porté sur les religions, parfois négatif et simplificateur, tend à en faire des objets nuisibles, du moins désuets, devant être jugés à l’aune de valeurs contemporaines, et ce, au détriment de l’analyse informée de réalités historiques complexes, ainsi que d’une réflexion favorisant la compréhension du monde contemporain et de l’humanité dans l’ensemble de sa riche diversité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.446
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.345
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it