MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2999447367 · doi:10.1097/mcd.0000000000000313

Haploinsufficiency of AKT3 gene causing microcephaly and psychomotor delay in a patient with 1q43q44 microdeletion

2020· article· en· W2999447367 on OpenAlexaff
Alessandra Pelle, Piergiorgio Modena, Anna Cavallini, Angelo Selicorni

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Dysmorphology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Canadian institutionsPediatric Oncology Group
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaploinsufficiencyMicrocephalyMedicineChromosomal AbnormalityPenetranceIntellectual disabilityCorpus callosumAKT3Microdeletion syndromeGeneticsGenePhenotypeAbnormalityChromosomePediatricsPathologyBiologyKaryotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deletion of the 1q43q44 chromosomal region has been related to a clinical syndrome characterized by neurodevelopmental delay, intellectual disability, microcephaly, congenital abnormality of the corpus callosum, and epilepsy and dysmorphic features. A wide variability of the clinical features have been linked to the contiguous deleted genes and incomplete penetrance has been observed too. Here, we report a 4-years-old boy with microcephaly, neurodevelopmental delay, and cardiac atrial septal defect, who had a de-novo 117 Kb 1q43-q44 microdeletion. The deleted chromosomal region encompassed the two genes SDCCAG8 and AKT3. The characteristics of the deletion and the clinical condition of the patient suggest a pathogenic role of the 1q43-q44 deletion, supporting a pivotal role of AKT3 gene in the expression of the clinical phenotype.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical DysmorphologySame topicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207