Femmes et propriété seigneuriale au Canada (XVII e -XIX e siècles) : les formes de l’autorité des « seigneuresses »
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans la société canadienne préindustrielle, la seigneurie constitue une composante fondamentale et caractérise les relations sociales ainsi que les modes d’accession à la terre. Au cours des deux siècles et demi pendant lesquels s’est officiellement maintenu le régime, les femmes ont joué un rôle significatif au sein de cette institution en détenant fréquemment l’autorité seigneuriale. Ces « seigneuresses », comme on les désigne dans les sources, sont toutefois rarement les égales des seigneurs et leur pouvoir est étroitement encadré par le droit et les conventions sociales. L’article s’intéresse aux formes et aux modalités de cette autorité seigneuriale féminine, qu’il s’agisse des religieuses-seigneuresses, des femmes concessionnaires de fiefs ou encore des héritières sans frère. Il vise à définir les formes et les limites de ce pouvoir féminin en croisant histoire du genre et histoire seigneuriale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".