MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2999514669 · doi:10.3934/mbe.2020116

Information theoretic measures of perinatal cardiotocography synchronization

2020· article· en· W2999514669 on OpenAlexaff
Philip Warrick, Emily Hamilton

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Biosciences & Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and fetal brain pathology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMutual informationTransfer entropyInformation transferCardiotocographyPathologicalConditional entropyBivariate analysisFetal heart rateSynchronization (alternating current)Entropy (arrow of time)FetusStatisticsMathematicsMedicineInternal medicineHeart ratePregnancyPrinciple of maximum entropyBlood pressureBiologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examined the use of bivariate mutual information (MI) and its conditional variant transfer entropy (TE) to address synchronization of perinatal uterine pressure (UP) and fetal heart rate (FHR). We used a nearest-neighbour based Kraskov entropy estimator, suitable to the non-Gaussian distributions of the UP and FHR signals. Moreover, the estimates were robust to noise by use of surrogate data testing. Estimating degree of synchronicity and UP-FHR delay length is useful since they are physiological correlates to fetal hypoxia. Mutual information of the UP-FHR discriminated normal and pathological fetuses early (160 min before delivery) and discriminated normal and metabolic acidotic fetuses slightly later (110 min before delivery), with higher mutual information for progressively pathological classes. The delay in mutual information transfer was also discriminating in the last 50 min of labour. Transfer entropy discriminated normal and pathological cases 110 min before delivery with lower TE values and longer information transfer delays in pathological cases, to our knowledge, the first report of this phenomena in the literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematical Biosciences & EngineeringSame topicNeonatal and fetal brain pathologyFrench-language works237,207