MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2999582661 · doi:10.1109/twc.2020.3036894

Stochastic Geometry Analysis of Sojourn Time in Multi-Tier Cellular Networks

2020· preprint· en· W2999582661 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Salehi, Ekram Hossain

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHandoverStochastic geometryPoisson point processCumulative distribution functionComputer scienceMobility modelBase stationCellular networkPoisson distributionCoverage probabilityWireless networkComputer networkMathematicsWirelessProbability density functionStatisticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Impact of mobility will be increasingly important in future generation wireless services and the related challenges will need to be addressed. Sojourn time, the time duration that a mobile user stays within a cell, is a mobility-aware parameter that can significantly impact the performance of mobile users and it can also be exploited to improve resource allocation and mobility management methods in the network. In this paper, we derive the distribution and mean of the sojourn time in multi-tier cellular networks, where spatial distribution of base stations (BSs) in each tier follows an independent homogeneous Poisson point process (PPP). To obtain the sojourn time distribution in multi-tier cellular networks with maximum biased averaged received power association, as the first step, we derive the area of contact, based on which we then derive the linear contact distribution function and chord length distribution of each tier. We also study the relation between mean sojourn time and other mobility-related performance metrics. We show that the mean sojourn time is inversely proportional to the handoff rate, and the complementary cumulative distribution function (CCDF) of sojourn time is bounded from above by the complement of the handoff probability. Moreover, we study the impact of user velocity and network parameters on the sojourn time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207