Tracking-free adaptive contact concentration photovoltaics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adaptive Contact Concentration Photovoltaics (ACCPV) is outlined as a scheme to access CPV efficiency improvements without mechanical tracking. This could allow CPV to play a role in applications where maintenance-free reliability and compact size are essential requirements. Conversion efficiency enhancement using sunlight concentration in multi-junction or potentially single junction solar cells due to the well-known increase in the Shockley-Quessar limit are enabled by replacing a tracking system with an array of switchable electrodes. Cell electrodes are segmented and are connected employing a switching system that adapts to sunlight conditions. Unlike CPV systems, the ACCPV concept allows for effective operation in diffuse sunlight conditions. System losses that must be considered in order to determine whether a net benefit for ACCPV exists for a given solar cell type include optical losses, series resistance losses, and Auger losses. The ACCPV concept is clearly presented and relevant system losses are discussed. A 3% absolute increase in triple junction cell efficiency is projected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it