MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2999659438 · doi:10.1093/infdis/jiz600

Corrigendum to: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Bronchiolitis

2020· review· en· W2999659438 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Kirolos, Sara Manti, Rachel Blacow, Gabriel Tse, Thomas W. Wilson, Martin Lister, Steve Cunningham, Alasdair Campbell, Harish Nair, Rachel M Reeves, Ricardo M. Fernandes, Harry Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Population and Public Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchiolitisClinical PracticeIntensive care medicineMedicineMedical physicsFamily medicineInternal medicineRespiratory system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In “A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Bronchiolitis” by Kirolos et al. [J Infect Dis 2019. doi:10.1093/infdis/jiz240], Table 1 and Figure 1 have been moved from supplementary material to the main body of the article for clarity. The authors regret the error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.269
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.145
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.269
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.004
Bibliometrics0.0110.011
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0070.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1450.054

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.319
GPT teacher head0.554
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207