IMPLEMENTASI BOARDING SCHOOL SEBAGAI UPAYA PENCEGAHAN PERILAKU HEDONIS DI KALANGAN REMAJA KAJIAN QS. AL-HADID: 20
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan dan mengetahui pengaruh implementasi boarding school sebagai salah satu upaya pencegahan perilaku hedonis di kalangan remaja, juga didukung dengan kajian QS.Al-Hadid: 20. Objek penelitian ini adalah siswa-siswi MAN Insan Cendekia Jambi. Jenis penelitian ini adalah kombinasi kualitatif dan kuantitatif, sehingga didapatkan hasil saling mendukung antara deskripsi dan besar pengaruh implementasi boarding school sebagai upaya pencegahan perilaku hedonis di kalangan remaja. Hasil analisis data kualitatif menyatakan bahwa implementasi boarding school dapat menjadi salah satu upaya pencegahan perilaku hedonis. Kemudian, hasil analisis data kuantitatif dengan analisis korelasi menunjukkan bahwa niai R = 0,9831. Ini berarti ada hubungan yang signifikan antara implementasi boarding school dan perilaku hedonis remaja. Sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa implementasi boarding school behubungan sangat signifikan dan dapat menjadi salah satu upaya pencegahan perilaku hedonis di kalangan remaja dengan nilai kontribusi sebesar 38,4%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it