Atractividad - Competitividad de destino turístico. Evaluación de Holguín para el mercado estadounidense
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El restablecimiento de las relaciones diplomáticas entre Cuba y Estados Unidos en 2015 provocó un crecimiento importante del flujo de visitantes estadounidenses a Cuba. A pesar de las restricciones legales que en la actualidad desestimulan dichos flujos, se consideró conveniente evaluar la atractividad - competitividad del destino turístico Holguín para distintos segmentos de clientes estadounidenses. Para desarrollar el estudio se propuso un procedimiento, que considera las mejores experiencias precedentes y que combina el análisis de la atractividad y la competitividad. Como resultado de la aplicación del procedimiento se determinaron los aspectos favorables y desfavorables que presenta el destino Holguín con relación a la atractividad turística para cada segmento estudiado; así como la posición competitiva que ocupa Holguín para los segmentos de yatistas, cruceristas y los que acceden por vía aérea. Se realizaron recomendaciones para favorecer la gestión efectiva del destino Holguín para dicho mercado
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".