MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2999700110 · doi:10.12957/soletras.2020.47482

A declaração de morte, um revelador de dificuldades interacionais no serviço telefônico de emergência

2020· article· pt· W2999700110 on OpenAlexaff
Marty Laforest, Jessica Rioux-Turcotte

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista SOLETRAS · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Communication and Language
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nas chamadas telefônicas dirigidas ao serviço de emergência, é comum que o estado emocional do chamador esteja alterado, em virtude do caráter perturbador do acontecimento motivador da chamada e da necessidade de se tomarem providências rapidamente. No entanto, apesar da premência característica de tais situações, um olhar atento revela que essas interações costumam desenvolver-se de maneira eficiente e inteligível, e podem ser consideradas harmoniosas. Há, entretanto, uma situação singular que é marcada pelo surgimento de dificuldades de comunicação entre o chamador e o atendente: quando uma pessoa é declarada morta. Esta contribuição se interessa pelas chamadas de emergência em que é feito um anúncio de morte. Nossa análise, conduzida numa perspectiva interacionista, baseia-se num corpus de chamadas dirigidas ao serviço telefônico de emergência 9-1-1. Descreve a resistência do chamador às solicitações e às instruções do atendente nessa situação. Concluímos que esse desalinhamento interacional está associado ao caráter padronizado do treinamento recebido pelos atendentes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.011
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista SOLETRASSame topicDigital Communication and LanguageFrench-language works237,207