Implementasi Data Mining Dalam Memprediksi Transaksi Penjualan Menggunakan Algoritma Apriori (Studi Kasus PT.Arma Anugerah Abadi Cabang Sei Rampah)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p><strong>Data mining ialah operasi resourcing dan penggunaan data untuk menemukan pola atau hubungan dari sekumpulan data berukuran besarData mining telah diimpelementasikan pada berbagai aspek, salah satunya pada bidang penjualan produk roti. Pihak perusahaan dapat mengetahui minat pembeli dengan memanfaatkan data mining untuk mengolah data penjualan produk roti. Penelitian ini menganalisis tentang pencarian informasi dari data transaksi penjualan roti menggunakan data mining dengan algoritma apriori. Dengan menggunakan algoritma apriori untuk menentukan pola kombinasi itemset dan aturan asosiasi pada PT. Arma Anugerah Abadi Cabang Sei Rampah, yaitu dengan nilai support dan confidence tertinggi adalah Roti Bungkus Coklat Keju dan Roti Bungkus Pres Kelapa dengan nilai support 17% dan nilai confidence 77%</strong><strong></strong></p><p> </p><p><em><br /></em><strong></strong></p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.021 |
| Open science | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it