MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Design and Optimization of a Multichannel Quartz Crystal Microbalance Sensor Array for Multiple Target Gas Detection

2019· article· en· W2999905519 on OpenAlexaff
Aashish Joseph, Arezoo Emadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuartz crystal microbalanceElectrodeFabricationMaterials scienceSensitivity (control systems)Substrate (aquarium)Sensor arrayOptoelectronicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NanotechnologyElectronic engineeringComputer scienceAdsorptionChemistryEngineeringChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quartz Crystal Microbalance is a candidate technology for high sensitivity gas detection that operates based on the thickness shear mode of piezoelectric crystal. These sensors can detect nanogram level of mass change on their electrode surface, which leads to a high accuracy of detection while benefiting from a simple geometry, low cost and ease of fabrication. Unlike conventional Quartz Crystal Microbalance sensors that are limited to a single-electrode structure hampering their detection capability, in this work a novel 5MHz multielectrode sensor is designed and optimized on a single substrate. This developed sensor can be used for detection of simultaneously present multiple gases in a complex environment. Therefore, this new design configuration eliminates the need for multiple sensors and reduces the complexity of fabrication and measurements. In order to enhance the proposed device's performance, analytical modeling and finite element analysis are further conducted to optimize the device structure for highsensitivity applications. A four-electrode 5MHz sensor configuration is developed on a single substrate with the optimized electrodes' thickness, radius, and center to center distance of 300nm, 500μm, and 6.5mm respectively. The sensor achieved a high sensitivity of 0.135 Hz.cm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> .ng <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> while eliminating the interference between the electrodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.479
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAcoustic Wave Resonator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207