MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2999961395 · doi:10.5205/1981-8963.2020.243211

Dificuldades no acesso aos serviços de saúde por lésbicas, gays, bissexuais e transgêneros

2020· article· pt· W2999961395 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Enfermagem UFPE on line · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Health in Brazil
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesScopusMEDLINEMedicinePsychologyPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objetivo: analisar as dificuldades de acesso aos serviços de saúde pelas pessoas LGBT. Método: trata-se de um estudo bibliográfico, descritivo, do tipo revisão integrativa da literatura. Realizou-se a busca em janeiro de 2019 nas bases de dados: MEDLINE, Web of Science e SCOPUS. Pesquisaram-se artigos com delimitação atemporal. Avaliaram-se os artigos segundo o critério AHRQ e sua elegibilidade pelo CASP. Analisaram-se os dados no software IRAMUTEQ a partir da Classificação Hierárquica Descendente. Resultados: destaca-se que a amostra final foi composta por dez artigos, entre eles, 70% encontraram-se disponíveis na SCOPUS; 10%, na Web of Science e 20%, na MEDLINE. Notou-se que, referente à nacionalidade dos estudos, 10% foram da Alemanha; 10%, do Brasil; 10%, da Argentina; 20%, do Canadá; 20%, da África do Sul e 30%, dos Estados Unidos da América. Verificou-se que os anos de publicação dos estudos foram entre 2013 e 2018. Conclusão: evidencia-se que o acesso aos serviços de saúde pela população LGBT é permeado por constrangimentos e preconceitos. Ressalta-se que a exclusão, desamparo, omissão e indiferença ao acesso são sentimentos expressados por este público, mesmo existindo políticas públicas específicas. Descritores: Serviços de Saúde; Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero; Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde; Enfermagem; Vulnerabilidade em Saúde; Política Pública.AbstractObjective: to analyze the difficulties of access to health services by LGBT people. Method: this is a descriptive bibliographic study of the integrative literature review type. The search was performed in January 2019 in the databases: MEDLINE, Web of Science and SCOPUS. We searched for articles with timeless delimitation. The articles were evaluated according to the AHRQ criteria and their eligibility by CASP. Data was analyzed in the IRAMUTEQ software from the Descending Hierarchical Classification. Results: it is noteworthy that the final sample consisted of ten articles, among them, 70% were available at SCOPUS; 10% on Web of Science and 20% on MEDLINE. Regarding the nationality of the studies, 10% were from Germany; 10% from Brazil; 10% from Argentina; 20% from Canada; 20% from South Africa and 30% from the United States of America. It was found that the years of publication of the studies were between 2013 and 2018. Conclusion: it is evident that access to health services by the LGBT population is permeated by constraints and prejudices. It is emphasized that exclusion, helplessness, omission and indifference to access are feelings expressed by this public, even though there are specific public policies. Descriptors: Health Services; Sexual and Gender Minorities; Health Services Accessibility; Nursing; Health Vulnerability; Public Policy.ResumenObjetivo: analizar las dificultades de acceso a los servicios de salud por parte de las personas LGBT. Método: este es un estudio bibliográfico descriptivo del tipo revisión integradora de literatura. La búsqueda se realizó en enero de 2019 en las bases de datos MEDLINE, Web of Science y SCOPUS. Buscamos artículos con delimitación atemporal. Los artículos fueron evaluados de acuerdo con los criterios AHRQ y su elegibilidad por CASP. Los datos se analizaron en el software IRAMUTEQ de la Clasificación Jerárquica Descendente. Resultados: cabe destacar que la muestra final consistió en 10 artículos, entre ellos, 70% estaban disponibles en SCOPUS, 10% en Web of Science y 20% en Medline. Con respecto a la nacionalidad de los estudios, el 10% provino de Alemania, el 10% de Brasil, el 10% de Argentina, el 20% de Canadá, el 20% de Sudáfrica y el 30% de los Estados Unidos de América. Se descubrió que los años de publicación de los estudios fueron entre 2013 y 2018. Conclusión: es evidente que el acceso a los servicios de salud por parte de la población LGBT está impregnado de restricciones y prejuicios. Es de destacar que la exclusión, la impotencia, la omisión y la indiferencia al acceso son sentimientos expresados por este público, a pesar de que existen políticas públicas específicas. Descriptores: Servicios de Salud; Minorías Sexuales y de Género; Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud; Enfermería; Vulnerabilidad en Salud; Política Pública.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it