MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2999979849 · doi:10.1093/ehjci/jez319.280

546 Machine-learning based exploration of echocardiographic patterns and clinical parameters to understand their relation to death or transplant in pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy

2020· article· en· W2999979849 on OpenAlexaff
Sergio Sanchez‐Martinez, Cameron Slorach, Wei Hui, Luc Mertens, Bart Bijnens, Mark K. Friedberg

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiologyMedicineInternal medicineEjection fractionDilated cardiomyopathyInotropeVentricular remodelingHeart failureBody surface area

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Pediatric dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) affects left ventricular (LV) function and carries a high risk of death or heart transplantation. However, the relation of LV regional function and inefficiency to clinical outcomes is underexplored. Purpose The aim of this study was to understand the relationship of regional LV mechanics, global LV function and clinical characteristics to the outcomes of death or heart transplant in children with DCM; through the integration of a vast amount of information enabled by unsupervised machine learning techniques. Methods DCM was defined by a LV end-diastolic dimension z-score > 2 and LV ejection fraction (EF) <55%. Longitudinal strain curves were sampled at 6 LV lateral wall and septal locations from the 4ch apical view. In addition, we analyzed other echo parameters including the aortic outflow pattern as a measure of LV pump function, QRS duration, LV EF, indexed end-diastolic LV dimension, global longitudinal strain and patient characteristics including age, weight, body surface area and medications (diuretics, ACE inhibitor, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, digoxin, inotropes, antiarrhythmics). We used an unsupervised machine learning algorithm (multiple kernel learning) to reduce the dimensionality of these data, and position patients based on similarities. We subsequently used k-means clustering to recover homogeneous groups of patients. We then interpreted the data patterns associated to each of the groups for the occurrence of death or transplant through non-linear regression analysis (multi-scale kernel regression). Results 50 children with DCM (age 0 to 18 years) were analyzed. Clustering on the two first dimensions of the low-dimensional space resulted in three clusters (Figure A), with significantly different proportions of the composite outcome of death or heart transplant (Cl1 = 79%, Cl2 = 50%, Cl3 = 20%; p = 0.01). The group with the highest proportion of death or transplant (cluster 1) comprised the oldest and most frequently medicated subjects, with impaired LVEF and GLS, and with the widest QRS duration (p < 0.01) (Figure B). The group with the second highest proportion of death or transplant (cluster 2) comprised patients with the lowest LVEF (p < 0.01) and GLS (p < 0.001), reduced and delayed peak aortic outflow velocity and severely impaired basal and apical LV strain (Figure C). In contrast, the group with highest transplant-free survival (cluster 3) had the highest LVEF and GLS values, the most synchronous LV contraction as assessed by strain and QRS duration and the highest amplitude and earliest peaking aortic flow. Conclusion Our results serve as a proof-of-concept that machine-learning based approaches can be useful to explore and understand which regional and global echo parameters in combination with clinical parameters are associated with a higher risk of death or transplant in pediatric DCM. Abstract 546 Figure

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular ImagingSame topicCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207