MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000008111 · doi:10.20414/komunitas.v10i2.1216

GRADUASI MANDIRI: BENTUK KEBERDAYAAN PENERIMA MANFAAT (KPM) PROGRAM KELUARGA HARAPAN (PKH) DI KABUPATEN PATI

2019· article· en· W3000008111 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKOMUNITAS · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Administration in Developing Nations
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeneficiaryGraduation (instrument)EmpowermentDignityBusinessPolitical scienceMathematicsLawFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Independent graduation, is a phenomenon of resignation from PKH program membership. This is different from some other social ministry programs. Programs that encourage the empowerment of beneficiary communities. Based on this uniqueness, this study specifically examines how the condition of PKH participants before and after graduation, as well as looking for forms of empowerment that are owned by PKH Graduasi Mandiri participants. Field findings indicate the empowerment process carried out by PKH facilitators through regular monthly meetings. Assistance is filled with the delivery of empowerment material. Materially, not much amount of assistance was received, but the assistance was carried out continuously. The form of KPM PKH empowerment after independent graduation can be seen through five indicators, including freedom of mobility, ability to buy small commodities, being involved in household decision making, having relative freedom from family domination, and having economic security and contribution to the family.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it