High-Voltage Superionic Halide Solid Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Li-Ion Batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
All-solid-state Li-ion batteries (ASSBs), considered to be potential next-generation energy storage devices, require solid electrolytes (SEs). Thiophosphate-based materials are popular, but these sulfides exhibit poor anodic stability and require specialty coatings on lithium metal oxide cathodes. Moreover, electrode designs aimed at high energy density are limited by their narrow electrochemical stability window. Here, we report new mixed-metal halide Li 3– x M 1– x Zr x Cl 6 (M = Y, Er) SEs with high ionic conductivity—up to 1.4 mS cm –1 at 25 °C—that are stable to high voltage. Substitution of M (M = Y, Er) by Zr is accompanied by a trigonal-to-orthorhombic phase transition, and structure solution using combined neutron and single-crystal X-ray diffraction methods reveal a new framework. The employment of >4 V-class cathode materials without any protective coating is enabled by the high electrochemical oxidation stability of these halides. An ASSB showcasing their electrolyte properties exhibits very promising cycling stability up to 4.5 V at room temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".