Reperfusion After Severe Frostbite: First Full-Thickness Necrosis After Initial Successful Thrombolysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 36-year-old male who suffered severe frostbite injuries to both feet presented with an estimated total body surface area at around 4%. These injuries resulted from the patient travelling from his town by foot, with a temperature of −10°C during 4 days. On route, he received rewarming therapy followed by thrombolysis that was initiated as the duration of the warm ischemia period resided under 24 hours. Immediately after the procedure, the feet recovered clinically up to the distal toes. Saturation revealed normal values. Thrombolysis ceased after 9 hours and angiography showed adequate perfusion of the toes. Three hours later, pedal pulses at the toes were lost. Subsequently, the patient developed blisters and progressive necrosis of the toes to midfoot. Both feet were managed expectantly and were dressed, but the conditions of both feet worsened and the tissue turned into full-thickness necrosis. The decision was made to amputate a month after thrombolysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".