MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000089957 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.190731

Osteochondritis Dissecans in Pediatric Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

2020· article· en· W3000089957 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Bradley C. Jackson, Debra Bartley, Roberta Berard

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteochondritis dissecansArthritisEtiologyLesionSurgeryCartilageArticular cartilageJuvenileCondyleOsteoarthritisInternal medicinePathologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: Joint pain and swelling are common symptoms of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with active joint inflammation. When patients with JIA have persistent pain or mechanical symptoms despite treatment of their inflammation, other causes must be considered. Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) is a focal alteration of subchondral bone formation that causes softening of the overlying cartilage, which can progress to instability, eventual osteochondral detachment, and early osteoarthritis1. Poorly localized knee pain with activity is common in early OCD lesions, and progresses to swelling, catching, or locking as the lesion becomes unstable1. The incidence in the general population is 9.5–29/100,000, occurring 2–3.8 times more frequently in males than females1,2,3. The most commonly affected joint is the knee1. Fifty-one to 69% of knee lesions affect the medial femoral condyle (MFC), and 16.5–33% affect the lateral femoral condyle (LFC)1,2,3. First-line management is conservative, with 33.5% requiring surgical intervention4. Multiple theories regarding the etiology of OCD lesions … Address correspondence to Dr. R.A. Berard, Department of Paediatrics, 800 Commissioners Road E, London, Ontario N6A 5W9, Canada. E-mail: Roberta.berard{at}lhsc.on.ca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of RheumatologySame topicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207