Intensive pulsed light sintered flexible conductive hybrid ink in 3D printed polymers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The deposition of electrically conductive electrodes and circuits onto polymeric materials is essential for embedded sensors and circuits. A hybrid copper ink consisting of graphene nanoplatelets and silver-coated copper nanopowders are developed for oxidation resistance and increased flexibility. To prevent thermal damages to polymeric substrates, we used an intensive pulsed light (IPL) to sinter the hybrid ink. The IPL process is analyzed to determine thermal characteristics during the sintering of hybrid inks and to correlate IPL irradiance power to sintering depth and resulting resistivity within the hybrid ink film. The benefit of adding graphene nanoplatelets (GnP) into the hybrid ink is also demonstrated in improved flexibility and durability in the bending tests. A process called selective IPL sintering is also utilized to micropattern the hybrid ink films into useful conductive patterns. The proposed method is demonstrated in an additive process where we embedded a strain sensor within a functional 3D printed polymer structure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it