MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000151984 · doi:10.1093/gbe/evaa001

Comparative Plastid Genomics of Cryptomonas Species Reveals Fine-Scale Genomic Responses to Loss of Photosynthesis

2020· article· en· W3000151984 on OpenAlexafffund
Goro Tanifuji, Ryoma Kamikawa, Christa Moore, Tyler Mills, Naoko T. Onodera, Yuichiro Kashiyama, John M. Archibald, Yuji Inagaki, Tetsuo Hashimoto

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome Biology and Evolution · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtist diversity and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of TsukubaJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceDalhousie University
KeywordsBiologyPlastidGenomicsPhotosynthesisEvolutionary biologyComparative genomicsScale (ratio)BotanyGenomeChloroplastGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Loss of photosynthesis is a recurring theme in eukaryotic evolution. In organisms that have lost the ability to photosynthesize, nonphotosynthetic plastids are retained because they play essential roles in processes other than photosynthesis. The unicellular algal genus Cryptomonas contains both photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic members, the latter having lost the ability to photosynthesize on at least three separate occasions. To elucidate the evolutionary processes underlying the loss of photosynthesis, we sequenced the plastid genomes of two nonphotosynthetic strains, Cryptomonas sp. CCAC1634B and SAG977-2f, as well as the genome of the phototroph Cryptomonas curvata CCAP979/52. These three genome sequences were compared with the previously sequenced plastid genome of the nonphotosynthetic species Cryptomonas paramecium CCAP977/2a as well as photosynthetic members of the Cryptomonadales, including C. curvata FBCC300012D. Intraspecies comparison between the two C. curvata strains showed that although their genome structures are stable, the substitution rates of their genes are relatively high. Although most photosynthesis-related genes, such as the psa and psb gene families, were found to have disappeared from the nonphotosynthetic strains, at least ten pseudogenes are retained in SAG977-2f. Although gene order is roughly shared among the plastid genomes of photosynthetic Cryptomonadales, genome rearrangements are seen more frequently in the smaller genomes of the nonphotosynthetic strains. Intriguingly, the light-independent protochlorophyllide reductase comprising chlB, L, and N is retained in nonphotosynthetic SAG977-2f and CCAC1634B. On the other hand, whereas CCAP977/2a retains ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase-related genes, including rbcL, rbcS, and cbbX, the plastid genomes of the other two nonphotosynthetic strains have lost the ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase protein-coding genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome Biology and EvolutionSame topicProtist diversity and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207