« Salle des maîtres », un effet négligé dans la transformation des pratiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans un contexte où l’injonction à l’inclusion peine à se concrétiser, nos recherches nous ont rendus témoins du désarroi d’enseignants qui tentent de modifier les pratiques pour favoriser une école plus inclusive. S’inscrivant dans une approche ethnographique, notre écoute, de ce que disent ces enseignants de leurs difficultés relationnelles au quotidien de la salle des maîtres, nous a surpris par les similitudes des difficultés auxquelles ils font face à différents niveaux des systèmes scolaires suisses et québécois. Que ce soit d’un côté ou de l’autre de l’Atlantique, trois points de convergences émergent de l’analyse de nos entretiens : un sentiment d’isolement ; l’utilisation de stratégies de protection des liens professionnels et l’impact du leadership de la direction sur la culture du lieu scolaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".