MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

La production médiatique d’une « crise migratoire »

2019· article· fr· W3000190414 on OpenAlex
Romain Leconte, Étienne Toureille, Claude Grasland

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSocio-anthropologie · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Refugees, and Integration
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceEthnologyArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Si le terme de « crise migratoire » s’est imposé dans le débat public pour qualifier les dynamiques de mobilités internationales en 2015, l’absence de modification brutale du système migratoire invite à chercher la crise dans sa représentation médiatique. S’appuyant sur des méthodes de lecture distante et sur une approche géographique, l’article propose une analyse des dynamiques spatio-temporelles de mise à l’agenda médiatique de la question migratoire dans un corpus de presse en ligne, mondial et multilingue. La variation dans le temps du flux d’information, relatif au fait migratoire, révèle des changements de régimes quantitatifs accompagnant des évolutions du contenu spatial des représentations de l’actualité migratoire (sélection et concentration des espaces couverts sur l’Union européenne et la Méditerranée orientale). Ces dynamiques conduisent à identifier l’émergence d’une crise géopolitique globale dans une démarche attentive à la production des imaginaires géographiques et aux changements d’échelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it