MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000191796 · doi:10.1002/zamm.201900228

Existence and integral representation of solutions for plane deformations of a micropolar elastic solid with surface elasticity

2020· article· en· W3000191796 on OpenAlexafffund
Alireza Gharahi, Peter Schiavone

Bibliographic record

VenueZAMM ‐ Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsBoundary value problemMathematical analysisUniquenessElasticity (physics)Robin boundary conditionFree boundary problemMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We consider a linear theory of elastic boundary reinforcement of a micropolar elastic solid subjected to plane‐strain deformations. The reinforcement consists of a thin micropolar elastic coating bonded to part of the boundary of the solid. The elastic properties of the coating incorporate both classical and micropolar bending, extension and twisting effects. Interior and exterior mixed boundary problems are formulated and analyzed using the boundary integral equation method. The boundary value problems are reduced to systems of singular integro‐differential equations to which Noether‐type theorems are shown to apply. We consider also the corresponding boundary value problems based on an alternative lower‐order shell model of the reinforcement. Finally, existence and uniqueness results are presented for the corresponding interior and exterior boundary value problems in the appropriate classical function spaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZAMM ‐ Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics / Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und MechanikSame topicNonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structuresFrench-language works237,207