Interference Suppression and Energy Efficiency Improvement With Massive MIMO and Relay Selection in Cognitive Two-Way Relay Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We analyze a relay assisted wireless communication link between two underlay massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) terminals. Specifically, an amplify and forwarding (AF) two-way relay is optimally selected to maximize the sum rate and to keep the interference on the primary user (PU) below an interference threshold. We first obtain asymptotic signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) values for two scenarios: (1) the relays and the two end nodes use transmit power scaling and (2) only the end nodes use transmit power scaling. For these two cases, we derive optimal power allocations subject to the PU interference constraints. With these optimal power allocations, we analyze how relay selection impacts the outage, the sum rate, and the energy efficiency of the network. For the first scenario, the outage can be reduced to zero with appropriate power allocation and the relay selection can be done offline. For the second scenario, outage will depend on the instantaneous channel state between the relays and the PU. Furthermore, for a realistic power consumption model, we analyze the energy efficiency and show that relay selection will increase it.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it