MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000256279 · doi:10.2118/186080-pa

Characterization of Multiphase Flow in CHOPS Processes Using a Systematic Framework

2020· article· en· W3000256279 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelative permeabilityPermeability (electromagnetism)Petroleum engineeringMultiphase flowSaturation (graph theory)Residual oilOil sandsEnvironmental scienceResidualOil productionGeologyMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineeringComputer scienceMechanicsMathematicsChemistryPorosityAlgorithmComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Cold heavy oil production with sand (CHOPS) technique has successfully improved oil recovery from heavy oil reservoirs due to high permeability channels resulted from sand failure and foamy oil flow enhancing heavy oil movability. However, impacts of the sand failure and the foamy oil flow on multiphase fluid flow features are still not properly understood. In this paper, an effective and systematic framework has been proposed to characterize the multiphase fluid flow and determine the three-phase relative permeability of CHOPS processes. A recently developed sand failure criterion and a relative permeability model have been integrated with a reservoir simulator to simulate the CHOPS process. The unknown parameters involved in the systematic framework are intelligently determined by an iterative ensemble smoother (IES) algorithm, which also enables sensitivity analysis on CHOPS production profiles. Subsequently, the proposed framework is tested through a laboratory CHOPS experiment. We obtained not only fairly history-matched production data (i.e., cumulative oil, gas, and sand production), but also satisfactorily converged three-phase relative permeability curves by iteratively assimilating production profiles of the CHOPS experiment. It has also been found that using two sets of three-phase relative permeability is capable of representing the segment-type nature of the multiphase flow and reproducing the transition stage on the production profiles. Furthermore, the comparison between two sets of three-phase relative permeability indicates that the sand failure phenomenon yields a reduced residual oil saturation and an increased oil/gas relative permeability. In addition, the sensitivity analysis demonstrates that the segment-type nature of production profiles results from the variation of key impact factors dominating the multiphase fluid flow in CHOPS processes. Overall, the proposed systematic framework can not only reproduce the physical phenomena of sand failure and foamy oil, but also provide a convenient tool to characterize the multiphase flow in CHOPS processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.381
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it