MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000284521 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000008872

Randomized controlled trial of <i>N</i> -acetylcysteine therapy for <i>RYR1</i> -related myopathies

2020· article· en· W3000284521 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua J. Todd, Tokunbor A. Lawal, Jessica W. Witherspoon, Irene C. Chrismer, Muslima S. Razaqyar, Monal Punjabi, Jeffrey S. Elliott, Fatoumata Tounkara, Anna Kuo, Monique O. Shelton, Carolyn Allen, Mary Cosgrove, Melody M. Linton, Darren Michael, Minal S. Jain, M. Waite, Bart Drinkard, Paul Wakim, James J. Dowling, Carsten G. Bönnemann, Magalie Emile-Backer, Katherine G. Meilleur

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle Physiology and Disorders
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsRYR1Randomized controlled trialAcetylcysteineMedicinePhysical therapyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Objective</h3> To investigate the efficacy of <i>N</i>-acetylcysteine (NAC) for decreasing elevated oxidative stress and increasing physical endurance in individuals with ryanodine receptor 1-related myopathies (<i>RYR1</i>-RM). <h3>Methods</h3> In this 6-month natural history assessment (n = 37) followed by a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, 33 eligible participants were block-randomized (1:1) to receive NAC (n = 16) or placebo (n = 17), orally for 6 months (adult dose 2,700 mg/d; pediatric dose 30 mg/kg/d). The primary endpoint was urine 15-F2t isoprostane concentration and the clinically meaningful co-primary endpoint was 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance. <h3>Results</h3> When compared to the general population, participants had elevated baseline 15-F2t isoprostane concentrations and most had a decreased 6MWT distance (mean ± SD 3.2 ± 1.5 vs 1.1 ± 1.7 ng/mg creatinine and 468 ± 134 vs 600 ± 58 m, respectively, both <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). 15-F2t isoprostane concentration and 6MWT distance did not change over the 6-month natural history assessment (<i>p</i> = 0.98 and <i>p</i> = 0.61, respectively). NAC treatment did not improve 15-F2t isoprostane concentration (least squares means difference 0.1 [95% confidence interval [CI] −1.4 to 1.6] ng/mg creatinine, <i>p</i> = 0.88) or 6MWT distance (least squares means difference 24 [95% CI −5.5 to 53.4] m, <i>p</i> = 0.11). NAC was safe and well-tolerated at the doses administered in this study. <h3>Conclusion</h3> In ambulatory <i>RYR1</i>-RM–affected individuals, we observed stable disease course, and corroborated preclinical reports of elevated oxidative stress and decreased physical endurance. NAC treatment did not decrease elevated oxidative stress, as measured by 15-F2t isoprostane. <h3>Classification of evidence</h3> This study provides Class I evidence that, for people with <i>RYR1</i>-RM, treatment with oral NAC does not decrease oxidative stress as measured by 15-F2t isoprostane. <h3>Clinicaltrials.gov identifier</h3> NCT02362425.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicMuscle Physiology and DisordersFrench-language works237,207