MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000295053

Le coeur en Lesse

2019· book· fr· W3000295053 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aurélien Dony

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtEthnologyHistory
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dinant et ses Coperes, sa Collegiale et sa Citadelle – avec majuscules, s’il vous plait –, son Rocher Bayard, ses bateaux-mouches et sa Croisette en bord de Meuse, son wallon savoureux, le jazz et Adolphe Sax… Et puis les alentours, Anseremme, son pont Saint-Jean, sa Lesse et ses kayaks, Bouvignes et ses ruines de Crevecœur… – « J’ai rendu, comme je le pouvais, un hommage aux arbres, aux oiseaux, aux amis qui m’ont donne a voir le monde dans la robe d’un paysage ourle de perles d’eau, brode de racines epaisses. Anseremme d’un cote, et c’est l’enfance?; Dinant de l’autre, et c’est l’adolescence. Entre ces deux poles, une infinite d’aventures banales qui ont faconne le cœur que je porte en dedans. Un cœur souleve par les crues de la Meuse, creuse par les meandres de la Lesse. ». – Homme de theâtre, poete et musicien, Aurelien Dony a publie cinq recueils de poemes, dont Puisque l’aube est defaite (M.E.O.), prix Georges Lockem de l’Academie royale de Langue et Litterature francaises de Belgique, ainsi qu’un roman a quatre mains avec Claude Raucy, Le temps des noyaux (M.E.O.). Il a represente la Belgique francophone au Festival international de la poesie de Trois-Rivieres et au Printemps poetique transfrontalier. Fondateur de la Compagnie du Reverbere, il a ecrit, mis en scene et interprete plusieurs pieces de theâtre. Il est enfin chanteur et parolier du groupe musical Geminides.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0780.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPolitical and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207