Bibliographic record
Abstract
The author presents the results of her research about real location of the “Guardian Committee of Foreign settlers in the South of Russia” building. The house was supposed to be located in Odessa. Having been established 200 years ago, the Committee was responsible for the development of the agricultural colonies on the South of Ukraine. It had to monitor the processes of the foreign settlements setting up and take care of them for more than fifty years. Nevertheless, the complete history of the Committee has not been written yet and the exact location of the building had not been found out before. The author proves that the building of the Guardian Committee is still available. It is considered as a monument of a local architecture; however nobody knows the real historical importance of the house. The building was erected in 1847 – 1848 as a shop that belonged to Valentina Shvendner. Then the house was sold to local authorities and became a main quarter of the Guardian Committee. After the Committee had been canceled the building was mentioned only as a Department of State Domains in the souses. It was forgotten that the Guardian Committee had been in the house before. The author has managed to identify the house using the plan and the architecture draft of it`s front wall made by an architect F. Morandy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".