MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000364143 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz203.783

P655 Pharmacokinetics of ustekinumab in children and adolescents with moderately to severely active Crohn’s disease: Results from UniStar, a phase 1 study

2020· article· en· W3000364143 on OpenAlexaff
Omoniyi J. Adedokun, Jeffrey S. Hyams, Dan Turner, Anne M. Griffiths, Natalie A. Terry, Lakshmi Padgett, Chris O’Brien, Joel R. Rosh

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUstekinumabPharmacokineticsFaecal calprotectinGastroenterologyCrohn's diseaseInternal medicineCalprotectinUlcerative colitisAdverse effectInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseaseInfliximab

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Ustekinumab (UST) is approved for the treatment of adults with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis. In the UniStar study, the pharmacokinetics (PK) of UST and its relationship with efficacy was evaluated in children who failed prior therapy. UniStar consisted of a PK portion (week 0–16) and extension (week 16–216); we report data through week 16. Methods UniStar is a multicentre, double-blind study (NCT02968108) designed to assess the PK, safety, and efficacy of UST in children (2–<18 years) with moderately to severely active CD, Paediatric CD Activity Index (PCDAI) score >30, and evidence of inflammation as measured by C-reactive protein >3.0 mg/l or faecal calprotectin >250 µg/g or ulcerations on ileocolonoscopy despite adequate treatment with corticosteroids and/or immunomodulators and/or anti-TNF therapies. Patients were randomised (1:1) and stratified by body weight (BW) and prior anti-TNF use for induction to one of 2 weight range-based IV doses: 130mg vs. 390 mg if BW ≥40 kg and 3mg/kg vs. 9 mg/kg if BW <40 kg. At week 8, all patients received a single subcutaneous (SC) UST maintenance dose of 90mg if BW ≥40 kg or 2 mg/kg if BW <40 kg. UST PK outcomes were assessed and compared with adult Phase 3 CD trials. Results 44 patients (59% ≥40 kg; >90% anti-TNF exposed) were randomised and treated with UST (n = 23 lower dose; n = 21 higher dose). Baseline demographics were generally similar between treatment groups. Most patients (67%) had a severe CD (PCDAI >40). At weeks 0 (1 h after infusion), 3, 6, and 8, mean serum UST concentrations (SUC) in the lower- (51.3, 7.7, 3.0, 1.6 μg/ml) and higher-dose groups (149.0, 23.7, 9.1, 4.8 μg/ml) were generally dose proportional (Figure 1a). Following SC UST at week 8, the impact of the difference in induction doses had diminished by week 16 when mean SUC was 1.5 µg/ml in the lower-dose group vs. 1.8 µg/ml in the higher-dose group. In the overall paediatric population (combined doses), serum UST concentrations were comparable to those in the reference adult CD studies (Figure 1b and c). In the higher dose group, we observed a pattern toward lower mean serum UST concentrations in patients weighing <40 kg vs. those weighing ≥40 kg; thus, UST should be dosed higher in patients <40 kg. Overall at week 8 and week 16, more patients achieved clinical response (PCDAI reduction ≥15) and biomarker improvement with higher UST concentrations, although this pattern was not observed for clinical remission (PCDAI ≤10; Figure 2). Conclusion Overall, UST PK was generally comparable between paediatric and adult patients with CD. A trend towards better efficacy outcomes with higher UST concentrations was observed in children similar to adults with CD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and ColitisSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207