MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000364263 · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2019.12.021

Total area of spontaneous portosystemic shunts independently predicts hepatic encephalopathy and mortality in liver cirrhosis

2020· article· en· W3000364263 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Praktiknjo, Macarena Simón‐Talero, Julia Römer, Davide Roccarina, Javier Martínez, Katharina Lampichler, Anna Baiges, Gavin Low, Elba Llop, Martin Maurer, Alexander Zipprich, M. Triolo, Geert Maleux, Annette Dam Fialla, Claus Dam, Judit Vidal‐González, Avik Majumdar, Carmen Picón, Dániel Tóth, Anna Darnell, Juan G. Abraldeṣ, Marta López, Christian Jansen, Johannes Chang, Robert Schierwagen, Frank Erhard Uschner, Guido Kukuk, Carsten H. Meyer, Daniel Thomas, Karsten Wolter, Christian P. Strassburg, Wim Laleman, Vincenzo La Mura, Cristina Ripoll, Annalisa Berzigotti, José Luís Calleja, Puneeta Tandon, Virginia Hernández–Gea, Thomas Reiberger, Agustı́n Albillos, Emmanuel Tsochatzis, Aleksander Krag, Joan Genescà, Jonel Trebicka, Sergi Quiroga, Dominic Yu, Luís Téllez, Mattias Mandorfer, Juan Carlos García‐Pagán, Claudia Berbel, Michel Blé, Ángeles García‐Criado, Ernest Belmonte, Michael Ney, Cristina Margini, Stefania Casu, Giuseppe Murgia, Christiane Ludwig, Franz Stangl

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hepatology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersHorizon 2020Instituto de Salud Carlos IIIMerck Sharp and DohmeDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean CommissionGilead SciencesBoehringer IngelheimFundación CellexAbbVieBoston Scientific Corporation
KeywordsHepatic encephalopathyCirrhosisMedicineGastroenterologyInternal medicineEncephalopathy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations152
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of HepatologySame topicLiver Disease and TransplantationFrench-language works237,207