MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000366215 · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2019.2953576

Energy Efficient User Association, Power, and Flow Control in Millimeter Wave Backhaul Heterogeneous Networks

2019· article· en· W3000366215 on OpenAlex
Sylvester Aboagye, Ahmed Ibrahim, Telex M. N. Ngatched

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematical optimizationComputer sciencePower controlBackhaul (telecommunications)Multi-commodity flow problemFlow networkComputational complexity theoryInteger programmingConvex optimizationSubgradient methodHeuristicAlgorithmPower (physics)MathematicsRegular polygonBase stationComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the problem of energy efficiency (EE) maximization via user association, power, and backhaul (BH) flow control in the downlink of millimeter wave BH heterogeneous networks. This problem is mathematically formulated as a mixed-integer non-linear program, which is non-convex. To get a tractable solution, the initial problem is separated into two sub-problems and optimized sequentially. The first is a joint user association and power control sub-problem for the access network (AN) (AN sub-problem). The second is a joint flow and power control sub-problem for the BH network (BH sub-problem). While the BH sub-problem is a convex optimization problem and hence can be efficiently solved, the AN sub-problem assumes the form of a generalized assignment problem, which is known to be NP-hard. To that end, we utilize Lagrangian decomposition to propose two polynomial time solution techniques that obtain a high-quality solution for the AN sub-problem. The first, referred to as Technique A, uses dynamic programming, the subgradient method, and a heuristic. The second, named Technique B, uses the multiplier adjustment method, the sorting algorithm, and a heuristic. Simulation results are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed energy efficient user association, power, and BH flow control algorithms as compared with benchmark user association schemes that incorporate the BH sub-problem algorithm, in terms of the total AN power, BH power, and overall network (AN plus BH) EE. The computational complexity and practical implementation of the proposed algorithms are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.344
Threshold uncertainty score0.382

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it