MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3000369353 · doi:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz203.333

P204 Re-established CRP cut-off in UC; it may be a better predictor of mucosal remission

2020· article· en· W3000369353 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Oğuz Kağan Bakkaloğlu, Tuğçe Eşkazan, Selma Bozcan, S. Yıldırım, Enes Ali Kurt, İbrahim Hatemı, Yusuf Erzın, Faruk Çelik

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonoscopyMedicineGastroenterologyInternal medicineUlcerative colitisContext (archaeology)CalprotectinColitisC-reactive proteinFaecal calprotectinDiseaseInflammatory bowel diseaseReceiver operating characteristicPredictive value of testsInflammationColorectal cancerCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Although faecal calprotectin can predict mucosal remission in ulcerative colitis, the CRP level in this context is insufficient and frequently stay under the current cut off level. While some patients with active mucosal disease have normal CRP levels most patients in mucosal remission have much lower CRP levels. The aim of this study is to define CRP cut off levels in the prediction of mucosal remission, considering both extensiveness and severity, in ulcerative colitis. Methods We retrospectively reviewed colonoscopy reports of ulcerative colitis patients (who are not on any steroid treatment at that time) which were performed between December 2016 and March 2019 and also their CRP levels which were obtained at the same week of the colonoscopy examination. We excluded the data of patients with any other possible cause of inflammation or infection at the time of laboratory assessment. Degree of mucosal disease at colonoscopy was evaluated according to endoscopic Mayo score. Mucosal remission was defined as endoscopic Mayo score 0 or 1. The extent of mucosal inflammation was classified according to Montreal classification. The CRP level with optimal sensitivity and specificity for mucosal remission prediction was assessed by ROC curve analysis and positive and negative predictive values were also calculated. Results A total of 331 colonoscopy reports of 260 patients (122 m, 138 f) were involved in this study. There were no significant differences between ages of patients when compared with ex, and Montreal classification and we did not find any correlation between age and CRP levels. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values for 5 mg/l, 3 mg /l and 2 mg/l are summarised in Table 1. CRP levels which predict Mayo 0 disease, mucosal remission (Mayo 0–1) and Mayo 3 disease are shown in Table 2. At the ROC curve analysis, we found that CRP level of approximately 2.9 mg/l can predict mucosal remission with a 77% sensitivity and % 80 specificity in all examinations without grouping into a separate segmental disease. For subgroups with Montreal E1, E2 and E3 ROC curve analysis suggested 1,8 mg/l (sn. 84%, sp. 90%), 2,7 mg/l (sn. 75%, sp. 75%) and 3 mg/l (sn. 80%, sp. 80%) CRP levels can be used for prediction of mucosal remission respectively (Table 3). It is important to emphasise that 30% of all patients with Mayo 3 colonoscopy and further 23% of patients with Montreal E3–Mayo 3 activity have CRP levels below the regular cut-off value of 5 mg/l. Conclusion CRP cut-off level of approximately 2.9 mg/l can predict mucosal remission in ulcerative colitis better than standard cut-off of 5 mg/l which has a low positive predictive value and specificity even at extended and active mucosal disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Crohn s and Colitis→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→