MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3000372630 · doi:10.1061/9780784482599.045

Optical Fiber Chloride Sensor for Health Monitoring of Structures in Cold Regions

2019· article· en· W3000372630 on OpenAlexafffund
Mériem Dhouib, David Conciatori, Luca Sorelli

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistère de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
KeywordsOptical fiberFiber optic sensorChlorideMaterials scienceFiberEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceComposite materialTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ever-increasing need to maintain aging existing reinforced concrete structures, especially in severe winter environments, in good condition and a cost-effective manner arises mainly in structural health monitoring methods, where it is necessary to adopt approaches that allow early detection of corrosion. Chloride-induced corrosion is a significant durability issue in cold regions where de-icing salts are used. This paper presents an embedded optical fiber chemical sensor that detects reliable free chloride concentrations into concrete cover in a precise non-destructive manner. It is based on fluorescence measurements using a chloride-sensitive fluorescent calcium-alginate sol-gel. Optical fibers were not affected by environmental factors, ions presences, or cold climate. Nevertheless, the fluorescent chemical sensor showed sensitivity towards alkalinity, temperature, leaching, and photo-bleaching. These restraints were encountered by applying a successfully validated ratiometric fluorimetry approach. Also, the durability and long-term stability of the sensor were studied. This sensor detects low chloride concentrations in a range of 0.045–0.45 M present in pore solution. It demonstrates a robust behavior, and excellent long-term stability so that it can withstand harsh environments. Thus, this sensor could provide a new approach towards the rapid, simple, and non-destructive monitoring of the structural health for detected the onset of corrosion damage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207